Trust me, the pairing in the title will make sense in a second.
I don't blog much for the simple reason that I don't like repeating what's being said elsewhere, and don't have the time to post links all the time. But I do want to comment on the recent filibuster fight.
Apparently, not satisified with getting 97% approval on their judges, Republicans are threatening to grind the Senate to halt with partisan bickering to end supposed filibusters blocking the remaining 3%. Never mind they blocked plenty of Clinton's nominees and blocking judges isn't that recent of a tactic by the party not in the White House.
Never mind that 3% denial rate is excessively strong. Out of 2,200 applications for pensions at the UMWA, I've denied about 550 - about 25% denial rate - and that's perfectly acceptable.
Never mind that we have a budget and spending bills and a huge deficit and a whole list of other issues to talk about instead of focusing on 3% of all judicial nominees.
What really irks me about this is that none of the filibusters are filibusters, just the threat of one. So, the Republicans didn't call a cloture vote on most of the nominees and the ones they did, they lost on. No one took to the floor to read, no one halted Senate business. They just said they intended to do so.
It's a lazy way of taking a stand. Dislike these 3% for being too damned conservative? Then filibuster by talking about nothing else for hours and days on end. And Republicans? If you want to break these filibusters, rather than mucking up the Constitution, why don't you actually force them to filibuster?
All this whining and posturing and bickering is over nothing.
Senators too lazy to actually filibuster are kind of like cigarette smokers. When they're doing making their point, they just toss the junk on the sidewalk without a second thought to the nearby trash can.
God I hate lazy polluters... I mean politicians.
Don't you?