Wake Up, Dick Morris!
Sometimes, even the profession political consultant-turned-pundits make me angry for their lack of knowledge.
Every week, every day, a new poll comes out judging the president’s performance and popularity. Our polling obsession makes our presidential system much more akin to a parliamentary one. When an incumbent president’s job-approval ratings sink below 50 percent, he becomes like a British prime minister who has just lost a vote of confidence in parliament.
I'm sorry, Dick, but you're wrong here. An incumbent president serves in office regardless of how low his popularity goes until 4 years after swearing in. A British prime minister, after losing a vote of confidence is likely to face an election, and has a hard time coming back to be Prime Minister again.
There's no comparing an unfavorable poll to a vote of confidence. Presidents and Prime Ministers can spring back from a bad polls; but only Presidents are immune from a damaging vote of no confidence.
Granted, his point is an unpopular President is more like a lame-duck one, and thus less effective. But his broad analogy makes me think he's not well informed about British politics. And I'm hardly an expert myself...
